How could an Intelligent Being allow such cruelty?
A most valid, most important, and most relevant question.
Â
To start with, I am afraid that by talking about this topic, it would be very difficult to be objective. We wonât be able to discuss it from a purely scientific perception.
We canât -even if we wanted to- be objective; as this issue entails feelings, emotions, philosophy, personal experience. Therefore I find that âhere- I canât be anything other than subjective; reflecting on my own personal life and my personal experiences.
Â
The most negative occurrences in the life of a human being can be summarized as such: physical pain, emotional pain (sorrow), and fear.
Below is the transcript and video for what might be my best interview ever.  There are more things I would have liked to touch on, such as 9/11 and Palestine, but in 25 minutes there is only so much one can say and I was guided by the questions.  For those who do not know I have a new show called Ken OâKeefeâs Middle East on The Peoples Voice and as a volunteer producing and presenting this show I need some support to carry on.  I simply cannot work full time and take care of family responsibilities.  Your support is given with a promise that I will speak about issues like the ones below and more with the best platform possible.  The image below is the link to support and/or share far and wide;
This show is really only possible to continue with viewer support.
SIX days have now passed since the atrocities in Paris, and it seems that the Western governmentsâ strongest efforts to pin the blame on radical ISIS jihadists is not going to plan.
Increasing numbers of observers and journalists are now questioning the role that the USAâs CIA and Israelâs Mossad may or may not have had in the killing of at least 129 people.
In one of the fiery oratories for which he was well-known, the late Hugo ChĂĄvez once stated that “the American empire is the greatest menace to our planet.”
Looking at the history of US engagement in Latin America, it is easy to see why ChĂĄvez made such a claim.
From overthrowing democratically elected leaders, operating death squads, and torturing civilians, the history of US involvement in the region helped create a widespread popular backlash that persists to this day.
Since the late 1980s the USAâs theatre of war has switched from Latin America to the Middle East, and many of the same tactics of that period were redeployed on the other side of the world.
Since the end of World War 2 the worldâs biggest super power has:
Attempted to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments, most of which were democratically-elected.
Dropped bombs on the people of more than 30 countries.
Attempted to assassinate more than 50 foreign leaders.
Attempted to suppress a populist or nationalist movement in 20 countries.
Interfered in democratic elections in at least 30 countries.
Investigations reveal that Pentagon officials at the highest levels oversaw torture facilities during the war in Iraq in 2003. The evidence includes: rooms used for interrogating detainees stained with blood; children tied into extreme stress positions with their bodies beaten to discoloration and others tortured with high voltage electricity and waterboarding.
Most chillingly, a veteran of the United States’ “dirty war” in El Salvador was reported to have been brought in to personally oversee the interrogation facilities.
As described by Iraqi officials this programme was condoned at the highest levels of the US military and utilized “all means of torture to make the detainee confess ⌠using electricity, hanging him upside down, pulling out their nails”.
At the now infamous School of the Americas, thousands of Latin American “special forces” were explicitly trained in torture techniques by US handlers. Many of those SOA graduates took their new training home to El Salvador, where they waged a war that killed an estimated 80,000 Salvadoran civilians.
The creation and patronage of locally trained indigenous militias â such as we are seeing with ISIS – to wreak havoc among subject populations in pursuit of American military objectives is a tactic that seems to have been adapted to the present day with great effect.
The USAâs most prominent trained paramilitaries were the Iraqi Special Operations Forces (ISOF), an elite counterterrorism force referred to as “the dirty brigade”.
Trained and guided by US military advisers at every level of its hierarchy, the ISOF was structured so as to place it outside the confines of normal oversight by international observers.
The use of torture, the patronage of sectarian proxy forces, and the facilitation of widespread human rights abuses all characterize US policy in the “war on terror”.
Evidence has emerged that ISIS and its military advances in northern Iraq and Syria has been shaped and controlled out of Langley, Virginia, and other CIA and Pentagon outposts as the next stage in spreading chaos in the worldâs second-largest oil state, Iraq, as well as weakening Syrian stabilization efforts.
There is widely corroborated evidence that MI6 cooperated with the CIA on a ârat lineâ of arms transfers from Libyan stockpiles to the Syrian rebels in 2012 after the fall of the Gaddafi regime.
So a year into the Syrian rebellion, the US and its allies werenât only supporting and arming an opposition they knew to be dominated by extreme sectarian groups; they were prepared to countenance the creation of some sort of âIslamic stateâ â despite the âgrave dangerâ to Iraqâs unity â as a Sunni buffer to weaken Syria.
But all is not as it seems.
According to well-informed Iraqi journalists, ISIS overran the strategic Mosul region, site of some of the worldâs most prolific oilfields, with barely a shot fired in resistance.
According to one report, residents of Tikrit reported remarkable displays of âsoldiers handing over their weapons and uniforms peacefully to militants who ordinarily would have been expected to kill government soldiers on the spot.â
We are told that ISIS masked psychopaths captured âarms and ammunition from the fleeing security forcesâ – arms and ammunition supplied by the American government. The offensive coincides with a successful campaign by ISIS in eastern Syria.
According to Iraqi journalists, Sunni tribal chiefs in the region had been convinced to side with ISIS against the Shiite Al-Maliki government in Baghdad. They were promised a better deal under ISIS Sunni Sharia than with Baghdad anti-Sunni rule.
Key members of ISIS were trained by US CIA and Special Forces command at a secret camp in Jordan in 2012, according to informed Jordanian officials.
The US, Turkish and Jordanian intelligence ran a training base for the Syrian rebels in the Jordanian town of Safawi in the countryâs northern desert region, conveniently near the borders to both Syria and Iraq.
Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the two Gulf monarchies most involved in funding the war against Syriaâs Assad, financed the Jordan ISIS training.
Advertised publicly as training of ânon-extremistâ Muslim jihadists to wage war against the Syrian Bashar Assad regime, the secret US training camps in Jordan and elsewhere trained perhaps several thousand Muslim fighters in techniques of irregular warfare, sabotage and general terror.
Former US State Department official Andrew Doran wrote in the conservative National Review magazine that some ISIS warriors also hold US passports!
Iranian journalist Sabah Zanganeh notes: “ISIS did not have the power to occupy and conquer Mosul by itself. What has happened is the result of security-intelligence collaborations of some regional countries with some extremist groups inside the Iraqi government.”
Very revealing is the fact that almost two weeks after the dramatic fall of Mosul and the âcaptureâ by ISIS forces of the huge weapons and military vehicle resources provided by the US to the Iraqi army.
Whatever the final details that emerge, what is clear in the days since the fall of Mosul is that some of the worldâs largest oilfields in Iraq are suddenly held by Jihadists and no longer by an Iraqi government determined to increase the oil export significantly.
Of course this is not the story given to us by our Western media, most of which owned by the same billionaire big businessmen which in turn manipulate our governments.
War propaganda often demands the abandoning of ordinary reason and principle, and the USAâs Dirty War in the Middle East demonstrates this in abundance.
Normal ethical notions of avoiding conflicts of interest, searching for independent evidence and disqualifying self-serving claims from belligerent parties have been ignored in much of the western debate.
As in previous wars, the aim is to demonise the enemy, by use of repeated atrocity claims, and so mobilise popular support behind the war.
In the words of leading Nazi, Hermann Goering: “Why of course the people don’t want war⌠that is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along.
âVoice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Today those who finance and arm the sectarian groups have slaughtered hundreds of thousands of innocent people in the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.
We now know is the air campaign against Islamic State in Iraq and Syria has killed more than 450 innocent civilians, according to a new report, even though the US-led coalition has so far acknowledged just two non-combatant deaths.
More than 5,700 air strikes have been launched in the campaign, which had its first anniversary this week with its impact on civilians largely unknown.
Now Airwars, a project by a team of independent journalists, has published details of 52 strikes with what it believes are credible reports of at least 459 non-combatant deaths, including those of more than 100 children.
One of the attacks investigated was on Fadhiliya, Iraq, on 4 April where witnesses and local politicians said a family of five had died, including a pregnant woman and an eight-year-old girl.
These figures do not take into account any more civilian deaths caused by French and US airstrikes since last Fridayâs Paris atrocities.
Finally to give some insight into the impact of US foreign policy in the Middle East, Wikileaks obtained and decrypted a previously unreleased video footage from a US Apache helicopter in 2007.
It shows Reuters journalist Namir Noor-Eldeen, driver Saeed Chmagh, and several others as the Apache shoots and kills them in a public square in Eastern Baghdad.
After the initial shooting, an unarmed group of adults and children in a minivan arrives on the scene and attempts to transport the wounded. They are fired upon as well.
The official statement on this incident initially listed all adults as insurgents and claimed the US military did not know how the deaths occurred.
Wikileaks released this video with transcripts and a package of supporting documents on http://collateralmurder.com
It is frightening in its content and a chilling sub text of the way the USA treats its friends and enemies.
It is also clear why the USA is so keen to bring Wikileaks founder and the director of the video into its custody.
As British Prime Minister Lloyd George said in 1916: âIf the people really knew the truth the war would be stopped tomorrow. But of course they donât know and canât know.â
No Time to Think 